Future of Life Institute: AI Safety and the Pause Letter
How Max Tegmark's nonprofit went from a small MIT panel to the group behind the world's most famous AI pause letter.
The Future of Life Institute is a nonprofit that works to keep powerful new technology from harming humanity. It is best known for its work on artificial intelligence. The group wrote the famous 2023 letter that asked labs to pause the most advanced AI experiments. It also created an influential set of AI safety rules years earlier.
This page explains what the Future of Life Institute is, who founded it, how it is funded, and why it matters in the wider AI debate.
What Is the Future of Life Institute?
The Future of Life Institute is a nonprofit that works to steer transformative technology toward benefiting life and away from large-scale risks. That mission statement comes from the Future of Life Institute itself. The group was founded in March 2014 in the Boston area.
Its main focus is advanced artificial intelligence. But it also works on other global dangers.
More than just AI
FLI worries about any technology that could cause huge harm. Its other focus areas include nuclear weapons, biotechnology, and climate change.
The common thread is scale. FLI cares most about risks that could affect all of humanity at once.
A public start at MIT
FLI held its first public event at MIT in 2014. It was a panel discussion called "The Future of Technology: Benefits and Risks."
The actor Alan Alda moderated the panel. From the start, FLI aimed to reach the public, not just experts.
Who Founded the Future of Life Institute?
The Future of Life Institute was founded by five people in March 2014. They came from science, technology, and academia. The group has led the organization ever since.
The five co-founders are a mix of physicists and tech figures.
The five co-founders
- Max Tegmark, a cosmologist and physics professor at MIT, who serves as president.
- Jaan Tallinn, a co-founder of Skype and a major funder of AI safety work.
- Viktoriya Krakovna, a research scientist at Google DeepMind.
- Meia Chita-Tegmark, a researcher who studies the social side of technology.
- Anthony Aguirre, a physics professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz.
A shared worry
The founders shared one big concern. They feared that human-level or superintelligent AI could pose a serious risk.
They did not want to stop technology. They wanted to make sure it stayed safe and helpful.
Who Is Max Tegmark?
Max Tegmark is a Swedish-American physicist who co-founded the Future of Life Institute and serves as its president. He is a professor of physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is the most public face of the organization.
Tegmark built his early career in cosmology, the study of the universe's origins. Over time, his focus shifted toward artificial intelligence.
The author of Life 3.0
Tegmark wrote the 2017 book "Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence." The title describes a new stage of life. In this stage, life can redesign both its body and its own software, or mind.
The book explores many possible futures shaped by AI. Some are hopeful, and some are frightening.
"Life 3.0" reached the New York Times bestseller list. It helped bring AI safety ideas to a mass audience and made Tegmark a household name in the field.
A leading safety voice
Tegmark uses his platform to push for caution. He argues that humanity is not ready for the AI it is building.
He often speaks about the race between AI labs. He warns that competition can push safety aside, a theme central to today's debate over how close we are to AGI.
The 2017 Asilomar AI Principles
The Asilomar AI Principles are 23 guidelines for building safe and beneficial AI. The Future of Life Institute created them at a conference in January 2017. The meeting took place at the Asilomar Conference Grounds in California.
More than 100 experts attended. They came from computer science, economics, law, and philosophy.
How the principles were made
The group did not just vote quickly. Each of the 23 principles had to win support from at least 90% of the participants.
That high bar was on purpose. FLI wanted rules that most of the field could accept.
What the principles cover
The principles cover research goals, ethics, and long-term risks. They call for AI to be safe, transparent, and aligned with human values.
After the conference, 1,797 AI and robotics researchers signed on. The principles became an early landmark in the field of AI safety.
The Pause Giant AI Experiments Letter
The "Pause Giant AI Experiments" letter asked all AI labs to pause their most advanced work for at least six months. The Future of Life Institute published it on March 29, 2023. It quickly became one of the most talked-about documents in tech.
The letter targeted the biggest systems. It asked labs to stop training AI more powerful than GPT-4.
What it warned about
The letter listed several dangers. These included AI-made propaganda, extreme job automation, human obsolescence, and a loss of control over society.
It argued that no one, not even the labs, could predict or control these systems. It said such power needed a pause and careful planning.
Who signed it
The letter gathered more than 30,000 signatures. Famous names included Elon Musk, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, and author Yuval Noah Harari.
Top AI scientists signed too, such as Yoshua Bengio and Stuart Russell. For the full timeline of how this letter fit into the AGI debate, see our explainer on how close we are to AGI.
Who Funds the Future of Life Institute?
The Future of Life Institute is funded mainly by private donations from tech figures and foundations. It does not sell products or take large government contracts. A few big gifts have shaped its budget.
Its most famous early backer was Elon Musk.
Musk's early gift
FLI's AI research program began in 2015. It started with a $10 million donation from Elon Musk.
That money funded 37 research projects on AI safety. The gift gave the young nonprofit real influence early on.
The Buterin donation
FLI's largest donor is Vitalik Buterin, a co-founder of the cryptocurrency Ethereum. In 2021 he donated crypto worth roughly $665 million.
That single gift made FLI far larger than most safety groups. FLI says Buterin has no formal or informal role in its decisions.
Awards and Autonomous Weapons
The Future of Life Institute does far more than write letters. It also gives an annual award and campaigns against killer robots. This wider work shows the group's broad view of technology risk.
One project honors quiet heroes of the past.
The Future of Life Award
FLI runs the Future of Life Award, which comes with a $50,000 prize. Jaan Tallinn funds it. The award honors people who helped humanity avoid disaster without much credit at the time.
Winners include Stanislav Petrov and Vasili Arkhipov. Both Soviet officers helped prevent nuclear war during the Cold War.
The fight against killer robots
FLI is a strong voice against lethal autonomous weapons. These are weapons that can pick and kill targets without a human choice.
The group released a chilling short film called "Slaughterbots" to warn the public. You can learn more in our guide to autonomous weapons.
Why the Future of Life Institute Matters
The Future of Life Institute matters because it helped turn AI safety into a global conversation. Its Asilomar Principles and pause letter reached far beyond the research world. Few nonprofits have shaped the debate as much.
Its founders lend it real weight. MIT's Max Tegmark and scientists like those it works with are hard to dismiss.
The criticism it faces
Not everyone praises FLI's approach. Some critics say its focus on future, world-ending risks pulls attention from present-day harms like bias and job loss.
This tension sits at the heart of the movement often called the AI doomers. FLI stands firmly on the side that warns loudly about long-term danger.
The bottom line
The Future of Life Institute is one of the most important groups in the AI safety world. It blends respected scientists, big donors, and bold public campaigns. Whether its warnings prove right is still an open question.
To follow the fight over AI's future that FLI helped start, read our daily AI briefing.
Frequently asked questions
▸ What is the Future of Life Institute?
▸ Who founded the Future of Life Institute?
▸ Who is Max Tegmark?
▸ Who funds the Future of Life Institute?
▸ What did the Pause AI letter say?
▸ What are the Asilomar AI Principles?
▸ What is Life 3.0 about?
▸ Is the Future of Life Institute credible?
Latest related briefings
Unclear AI Regulations: What It Means for You
Microsoft's critique of US AI regulations highlights potential risks for everyday people, stressing need for clear policies.
Read analysis JOBS LABORIndia's AI Workforce Boom Leaves Workers in Limbo
India's AI job surge outpaces governance, leaving workers vulnerable to job insecurity and ethical concerns.
Read analysis REGULATION POLICYEU AI Act: How Retail Data Changes Affect You
The EU AI Act shifts focus to how retailers manage data, affecting consumer privacy and data handling practices.
Read analysis